Barrion vs Burp Suite
Barrion and Burp Suite serve different workflows. Barrion runs passive, automated checks on your web app (headers, TLS, config) that are safe for production and built for continuous monitoring. Burp Suite is a hands-on testing platform for security testers and pentesters. This comparison helps you choose the right tool for the job.
Comparison at a glance
| Aspect | Barrion | Burp Suite |
|---|---|---|
| Scan type | Passive, automated, read-only, production-safe | Manual and automated, proxy-based, active testing and exploitation |
| User | Set and forget, or run on demand, no security expertise required | Security tester or developer driving the tool, requires expertise |
| What it finds | Misconfigurations, TLS/headers, cookies, exposure, drift | Full range of app sec issues, OWASP, business logic, chained attacks |
| Use case | Continuous monitoring, compliance, audit evidence | Pentests, security assessments, ad-hoc testing |
| Remediation | Step-by-step fixes per finding, PDF/CSV export | Findings and manual follow-up, reporting via Burp or export |
| Pricing | Free tier, paid for monitoring | Free (Community), Pro and Enterprise (commercial) |
Who Barrion is best for
Teams that want automated, ongoing web app security without a dedicated tester. Good for engineering teams, agencies, and compliance. Complements rather than replaces Burp for deep testing.
Who Burp Suite is best for
Security testers and pentesters who need full control over requests, manual exploration, and active exploitation. Essential for thorough assessments and finding complex vulnerabilities.
Summary
Barrion and Burp Suite address different needs. Use Barrion for continuous, passive monitoring and audit-ready evidence. Use Burp for manual and automated penetration testing. Many teams use Barrion year-round and Burp (or similar) for periodic deep tests.
Try Barrion with a free scan, no credit card required. See your results and step-by-step fixes in under a minute.
Run free security scan →
