Barrion vs Mozilla Observatory
Barrion and Mozilla Observatory both check web security from the outside (headers, TLS, etc.). Observatory is free and gives a one-off grade with recommendations. Barrion adds continuous monitoring, alerts when things change, step-by-step fixes, and audit-ready reports. This comparison is for teams deciding between a free snapshot and ongoing coverage.
Comparison at a glance
| Aspect | Barrion | Mozilla Observatory |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Continuous, scheduled scans, alerts on change | On-demand, run when you visit the site |
| Output | Per-check results, step-by-step fixes, PDF/CSV export, history | Single grade (A–F), category scores, written recommendations |
| Scope | Headers, TLS, cookies, mixed content, email config, exposure, 40+ checks | Headers, TLS, and related best practices |
| Remediation | Step-by-step fixes per finding, stack-specific guidance | Recommendations and links to docs |
| Audit / compliance | Scan history, trends, export for auditors | Snapshot only, no built-in history |
| Pricing | Free tier, paid for monitoring and alerts | Free |
Who Barrion is best for
Teams that want to move from occasional checks to continuous assurance, get alerts when config drifts, and need exportable evidence for audits or compliance.
Who Mozilla Observatory is best for
Anyone who wants a quick, free check of their headers and TLS. Great for a first pass or ad-hoc validation.
Summary
Observatory is a solid free starting point. Barrion adds continuous monitoring, alerts, fix guidance, and audit-ready history. If you only need an occasional grade, Observatory may be enough. If you want ongoing assurance and evidence, Barrion is the next step.
Try Barrion with a free scan, no credit card required. See your results and step-by-step fixes in under a minute.
Run free security scan →
