Barrion vs Probely
Barrion and Probely both help teams secure web applications. Barrion focuses on continuous, passive scanning with step-by-step remediation and audit-ready reports, safe for production. Probely offers DAST scanning with CI/CD and tracker integrations. Below we compare scan type, use case, and production safety.
Comparison at a glance
| Aspect | Barrion | Probely |
|---|---|---|
| Scan type | Passive (read-only), production-safe | DAST, active scanning of apps and APIs |
| Use case | Continuous monitoring, misconfigurations, TLS/headers, compliance evidence | Vulnerability scanning in CI/CD or on-demand |
| Remediation | Step-by-step fixes per finding, PDF/CSV export | Findings with guidance, Jira/GitHub integration |
| Production | Designed for production, zero risk | Often used in staging/CI, active scans can affect availability |
| Free tier | Free plan with core checks and daily scans | Free trial, check current plans |
Who Barrion is best for
Teams that want production-safe, continuous web app monitoring and clear remediation without active scanning. Good for engineering teams and compliance evidence.
Who Probely is best for
Teams that want DAST in CI/CD or integrated with issue trackers and are comfortable running active scans in non-production or controlled environments.
Summary
Barrion suits continuous, passive coverage and audit readiness. Probely suits CI/CD-integrated DAST. They can complement each other: Barrion for always-on production monitoring, Probely for pipeline scanning, depending on your needs.
Try Barrion with a free scan, no credit card required. See your results and step-by-step fixes in under a minute.
Run free security scan →
