Barrion vs Snyk
Barrion and Snyk both help dev and engineering teams secure their applications but at different stages. Barrion focuses on the live web app: TLS, headers, config, and exposure, with passive scanning safe for production. Snyk focuses on code, dependencies, and build-time assets. This comparison clarifies where each fits.
Comparison at a glance
| Aspect | Barrion | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Live web app: URLs, headers, TLS, cookies, email config | Code, dependencies, containers, IaC, open source |
| When | Runtime, what is deployed and exposed | Build and develop, before and as you deploy |
| Scan type | Passive, read-only, production-safe | Code analysis, dependency scan, container scan, IaC scan |
| Use case | Continuous web app monitoring, compliance, drift, audit evidence | Shift-left security, dependency and container vulnerability management |
| Remediation | Step-by-step fixes per finding, PDF/CSV export | Fix suggestions, PRs, upgrade paths, IDE integration |
| Pricing | Free tier, paid for monitoring | Free tier, paid plans per developer or usage |
Who Barrion is best for
Teams that need visibility into what is actually exposed on the web (headers, TLS, config) and audit-ready evidence. Good for continuous monitoring without code or repo access.
Who Snyk is best for
Teams that want to find and fix issues in code and dependencies early, with developer-native workflows and CI/CD integration.
Summary
Barrion and Snyk are complementary. Barrion secures the running web app and its configuration. Snyk secures the code and supply chain. Use both for full coverage: Snyk for shift-left, Barrion for runtime and compliance.
Try Barrion with a free scan, no credit card required. See your results and step-by-step fixes in under a minute.
Run free security scan →
