DevSecOps
Security that fits the way engineering teams already work.
SAST on every PR. DAST in CI. Findings route to Slack. Remediation PRs open themselves. Audit evidence accumulates automatically.
What you get
From commit to remediation, without a security team in the loop.
Shift-left
SAST in the PR
Rule-based + AI-enhanced static analysis triggered on commit or PR. Findings appear inline on the diff with framework-specific remediation.
CI/CD
Pipeline-friendly DAST
Trigger production-safe scans from your pipeline post-deploy. Fail builds on critical findings, log everything else.
Routing
Findings to Slack & Teams
Critical findings page the on-call engineer. Score drops post to #security. Real-time on Business.
Remediation
AI fix PRs
Barrion opens a remediation PR for select finding classes. Reviewer-approved before merge, no black-box automation.
Evidence
Audit-ready by default
Every scan's history becomes evidence. Hand the auditor a PDF + CSV without a fire drill.
Stack-aware
Framework-specific fixes
Next.js, Django, Laravel, Rails, Express. Remediation steps copy-paste into your codebase.
What integrates
Plugs into the tools you already use.
- ✓GitHub PR checks, inline finding comments, repo-level scan triggers
- ✓Slack and Teams for finding routing and score-drop alerts
- ✓Email alerts for solo developers or anyone who lives in their inbox
- ✓Webhook notifications for custom pipelines
- ✓CI triggers from GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, anything that can hit a URL
FAQ
DevSecOps, in practice.
What does 'shift-left' actually mean in practice?
Shift-left means moving security checks earlier in the development lifecycle so issues are caught before they ship, not after a customer reports them. In Barrion's case that's static analysis on every pull request (so the diff itself is gated), continuous DAST against staging post-deploy, and PR-aware remediation suggestions written for the framework the team is actually using. The goal is to give developers actionable signal in the editor and the PR, not a quarterly report that nobody reads.
Can Barrion fail a build on critical findings?
Yes. The GitHub PR check can be configured to fail on findings above a chosen severity threshold (e.g. only critical, or critical + high). Most teams start with reporting-only to tune false positives and then move to enforcing once the signal is clean. Fail-on-merge gating is also supported via branch protection rules.
How do you handle false positives in CI?
Findings can be marked as won't-fix or accepted-risk with a reason; once marked, they're suppressed from future PRs on the same code path. Suppressions are visible in the dashboard and auditable. Rule-level tuning is also available, if a specific detector is too noisy on your stack, you can lower its severity or disable it organisation-wide.
What CI platforms does Barrion integrate with?
GitHub Actions natively (PR checks, finding comments, status reports). Other CI platforms (GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins, Buildkite) trigger scans via HTTP webhook with the repo and ref; findings then flow back into the Barrion dashboard. The DAST product can also be triggered post-deploy from any pipeline that can hit a URL.
Does this slow down our deploys?
SAST runs in parallel with your existing PR checks and is typically the fastest one on the PR (most repos finish in under 90 seconds). DAST runs against staging post-deploy and does not block the deploy unless you explicitly wire it as a gate. For teams shipping multiple times per day, neither product is on the critical path of a release by default.
Wire it into your pipeline.
Free first scan, then integrate GitHub on Essential or Business.